‘From what is it they flee?’
He took a while to reply. By the time he spoke the men had gone inside. He said quietly, ‘They killed the King.’
1660, General Edward Whalley and Colonel William Goffe, father- and son-in-law, cross the Atlantic. They are on the run and wanted for the murder of Charles I. Under the provisions of the Act of Oblivion, they have been found guilty in absentia of high treason.
In London, Richard Nayler, secretary of the regicide committee of the Privy Council, is tasked with tracking down the fugitives. He’ll stop at nothing until the two men are brought to justice. A reward of £100 hangs over their heads – for their capture, dead or alive.
Act of Oblivion
Robert Harris
Hutchinson Heinemann
Supplied by Penguin Random House New Zealand
Reviewed by Stephen Litten
The Indemnity and Oblivion Act of 1660, following the restoration of the English Monarchy, resulted in the pursuit and prosecution of those guilty of the regicide of Charles I. Naturally, the accused viewed the probable punishment, hanging, drawing and quartering and your head on a spike for all to see, with a bit of alarm and decided hiding abroad was a good idea. Two of these gentlemen were Edward Whalley and his son-in-law William Goffe. And their hiding place was New England.
Act of Oblivion is a novelised telling of history in the same vein as Schindler’s Ark. All the characters
are attested in history, with the exception of one: Richard Naylor, the man in charge of the hunt.Harris created him on the rational, if there was a manhunt, there ought to have been someone in charge. Naylor certainly comes across as a driven character, out to revenge the death of his pregnant wife due to the behaviour of Whalley and Goffe. These two have contrasting natures. Goffe appears to be a religious fanatic, known as Praying William to contemporaries. Whalley was apparently not as fervent in his beliefs.
Harris’s novel covers the period from 1660, when the two men flee to Massachusetts colony, to 1679, the last known mention of Willian Goffe. Harris covers the sliding support that various policies and religious factions enjoy: revenge for the King, millenarianism in some of the Puritan congregations, Cromwellian transportation of “undesirables.” Harris also demonstrates the effect of patchy and slow communication between the colonies and the metropolis. Interestingly, Harris doesn’t mention John Dixwell, another regicide who also hid in New Haven Colony alongside Goffe and Whalley.
I enjoyed this novel/novelised history. While I knew that several of the regicides were disinterred,
tried and convicted and their corpses dismembered, I had forgotten about the initial fervour for
revenge. Indeed, those that escaped the revenge are often completely ignored in the discussion of
history. I recommend this book for those with an interest in both English history and American
Colonial history. Well worth the read. Thank you to Penguin Random House for the review copy.